|
Transcendence might be characterized as everything that is beyond our
understanding:
all that we don't know, everything that we've forgotten and are in need
of remembering, all that is still potential.
When
we point toward transcendence, we point the direction of travel from
our
present do-be-and-have world to that which it is possible for us to
become,
and to that which draws and empowers us to become it.
Inasmuch
as transcendence exceeds our understanding, it is no easy target to
point
to. As Heraclitus says in Fragment 123: "The nature of things
is
in the habit of concealing itself."
Yet if
we bear in mind that transcendence is beyond all that we think we know,
it may be possible to catch glimpses of mystery in the mirror of
presently
existing things. The warrior artist Miyamoto Musashi put it
this
way in his A Book of Five Rings: "What is
called the spirit
of the void is where there is nothing. It is not included in
man's
knowledge. Of course the void is nothingness. By
knowing things
that exist you can know that which does not exist. This is
the void."
Elusive
though the mysterious nature of things may be, as we look back over the
course of our history and evolution--from the origin of our
constituent
elements in the hearts of long-dead stars to the continual practice of
our ancestral line of trading in one form and set of habits for
another--what
we view is the fossil remains of the steps we have taken in our pursuit
of transcendence.
Jalaludin
Rumi, writing more than seven hundred years ago, stated the
intermediacy
of our situation like this: "Originally, you were
clay. From
being mineral, you became vegetable. From vegetable, you
became animal,
and from animal, man. During these periods man did not know
where
he was going, but he was being taken on a long journey
nonetheless.
And you have to go through a hundred different worlds yet."
There
is no name that is sufficient to transcendence. The Tao
Te Ching
specifically warns, "The Tao that can be named is not the true Tao."
If this
warning is necessary, it is because our present state of being is
language
based. Our practice is to approach the hidden nature of
things by
means of words--mythic metaphors. As Joseph Campbell, the
life-long
student of myth, declared late in life: "My definition of
myth now
is: a metaphor transparent to transcendence."
Every
period has its own names for transcendence--metaphors which link the
most
promising, advanced and encompassing knowledge of the time to unknown
things,
higher possibilities and human becoming. In these concepts of
possibility
are to be found the work, the power, and also the limitation of the age.
As we
are told in The Dabistan, attributed to Mohsin
Fani, "The sagacious
say: Every era is the epoch of the fame and dominion of a
name, and
when this epoch expires, it becomes concealed under the name which it
had
at the epoch of its flourishing state."
The most
potent name of transcendence for the modern Western world has been
"science."
This metaphor has been used to include and lay claim to everything that
is and also everything that might be. However, it has been
most truly
used when those employing it have been able to remember that there is a
difference between the actual accomplishments of science and the
fathomless
mystery of transcendent reality.
We are
reminded of this in The Mysteries of Science by
Brian M. Stableford,
which concludes:
"Isaac
Newton, the man who synthesized the discoveries of the
seventeenth-century
physical scientists and astronomers into a new theory of the universe,
and provided modern science with its first great edifice of organized
knowledge,
spoke of himself as follows: 'I do not know what I may appear
to
the world, but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on
the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother
pebble
or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay
all undiscovered before me.'
"Today,
we have a great collection of smoother pebbles, and a fine array of
prettier
shells--assemblies so great that it is easy to lose ourselves in
examination
and contemplation of their wonders. But we must realise, and
never
forget, that no matter how great the collection grows, the undiscovered
ocean will still surround the shores of our imagination."
It is
the directed imagination that stands on the shores of the known and
fishes
in the waters of the void for whatever seems most urgently
needed.
What separates superior scientists from lesser ones is their awareness
that "science" has been only one name among many for this process.
In his
essay, "Creativity--Especially in Science," biologist Peter Medawar
wrote:
"I feel enlarged, not diminished, by the thought that any truth begins
life as an imaginative preconception of what the truth might be, for it
puts me on the same footing as all other people who use the imaginative
faculty."
A name
loses its power after it has been successful in fishing something that
never existed before out of the void and into present being.
Then
circumstances become altered and new needs arise.
It is
this process to which Lewis Mumford was referring in his book, The
Condition
of Man, when he observed: "At the very moment that
mankind as
a whole is clothed, fed, sheltered adequately, relieved from want and
anxiety,
there will arise new conditions, calling equally for struggle, internal
if not external conditions, derived precisely from the goods that have
been achieved."
A name
has visibly lost its power when it is such a worldly success that it
begins
to cherish its pebble collections at the expense of the undiscovered
ocean,
and even to confuse the two.
Joseph
Campbell said: "If the metaphor closes in on itself and says, 'I'm it,
the reference is to me or to this event,' then it has closed the
transcendence;
it's no longer mythological."
When
a particular metaphor of transcendence has become an all-too-concrete
actuality
and thereby lost its ability to connect us to what is still beyond us,
then it must be swapped for another more appropriate word of power
through
which to approach the true nature of things.
As Charles
Fort reminds us:
"That
firmly to believe is to impede development.
"That
only temporarily to accept is to facilitate."
When Shams
of Tabriz was young, he perceived that the accustomed words of
transcendence
of his time had turned into idols and that the people around him
mouthing
these words had lost contact with the higher reality they formerly
indicated.
When he set forth to find his own way to truth, he was taken as
unmannerly,
overbearing and incomprehensible.
In his
Maqalat,
Shams tells us:
"I have
been a misfit since childhood. Nobody used to understand
me.
Not even my father, who once said: 'You are not a madman to
be put
in a madhouse, nor a monk to be put in a hermitage. I don't
know
what you are.'
"I said:
'Listen to this, father. My case is like that of the duck egg
that
was put under a hen. When the egg hatched, the duckling
walked about
with the mother hen until they came to a pond. The duckling
went
into the water. The hen stayed on the bank. Now, my
dear father,
after having tried the sea, I find it my home. If you choose
to stay
on the shore, I am not to be blamed.' "
Names
are only names; take them as such. The ocean is our home--if
only
we can remember what we've forgotten.
In The
Book of the Damned, Charles Fort wrote: "Our whole
'existence'
is an attempt by the relative to be the absolute, or by the local to be
the universal." And he said further: "A seeker of
Truth. He
will never find it. But the dimmest of possibilities--he may
himself
become Truth."
Jalaludin
Rumi recognized
the light of truth in Shams of Tabriz. He wrote of him:
Be silent, listen!
There goes Shams of Tabriz
Rising from the East
Maybe we can hear
The sound of Light's footsteps.
After
he met Shams, Rumi threw over his former life as the leading religious
professor of his time. He took up music and dance, and began
to utter
poetry and to tell stories.
Jalaludin
Rumi expressed the mystery of transcendence and the challenge it poses
as timelessly as anyone ever has. Over the centuries, he
directs
this question to us and presents this proposition:
How long shall we, in the Earth-world, like children
Fill our laps with dust and stone and scraps?
Let us leave earth and fly to the heavens,
Let us leave babyhood and go to the assembly of Man.
Return to Contents
Find Related Material
Take a Leap
|